Legal Opinion

La Barre v. Bent

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 2, 1908No. Docket No. 65Published

Error to Cass; Des Voignes, J. Case by Warren La Barre, highway commissioner, against Fred M. Bent for obstructing a highway. There was judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

The plaintiff, a commissioner of highways, prosecuted the defendant in an action of trespass on the case, commenced in justice’s court by summons, to recover a penalty prescribed by statute (2 Comp. Laws, § 4157) for an obstruction of a highway. A written declaration was filed, followed by a plea of the general issue, with notice denying the existence of the highway, and a claim that the land was owned in fee simple by defendant. Defendant also filed with the justice the statutory bond required where title to land comes in question, who thereupon certified the cause to the circuit court,…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Village of Grandville v. JenisonMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  2. People ex rel. Goldsmith v. Highway CommissionersMichigan Supreme Court · 1866
  3. Detroit Sharpshooters' Ass'n v. Highway CommissionersMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
  4. Dupont v. Highway CommissionersMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
  5. Pardee v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1873

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API