Legal Opinion

Harden v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 12, 2013No. SD 32315PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

GARY W. LYNCH, Judge.

Joseph Wayne Harden (“Movant”) appeals the denial of his Rule 29.151 post-conviction motion alleging ineffective assistance of counsel. Movant contends that counsel was ineffective, first, for failing to file a motion to dismiss the charges against him or to dismiss the State’s notice of death based on prosecutorial vindictiveness and, second, for failing to request that the trial court strike the testimony of Donald Booth. Finding no clear error in the motion court’s judgment as claimed, we affirm.

Factual and Procedural Background

On July 7, 2008, Al Harper (“Al”) paid…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. GoodwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Sanders v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1987
  4. Zink v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009
  5. State v. HunterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Joseph Harden v. Michael BowersoxCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API