Legal Opinion
Kozyra v. Goldstein
New York Supreme Court
Decided November 8, 1989PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
John Copertino, J.
These are actions by creditors to set aside a conveyance of real property as fraudulent. Defendant Frances Goldstein moves for summary judgment based upon the death of her husband, the debtor.
The actions were joined for trial by a prior order of this court; the three plaintiffs were creditors of Charles Goldstein, deceased. Teresa Kozyra alleges a judgment against Mr. Gold-stein for. $49,666.02 for loans extended and never repaid. Dolores A. Scheele seeks recovery of two judgments she alleges she obtained against Mr. Goldstein in the amount of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hiles v. . FisherNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
- In Re the Appraisal, Under the Transfer Tax Law, of the Estate of LyonNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
- In re the Accounting of GranwellNew York Court of Appeals · 1967
- In re the Estate of DickieNew York Surrogate's Court · 1968
- Kashan v. KosoffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re RerisiUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1994
- St. Teresa's Nursing Home v. VuksanovichAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Tompkins Community Hospital v. TomassiniNew York Supreme Court · 1993