Legal Opinion

Territory of Hawaii v. Sumngat

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided August 9, 1950No. 2757PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

KEMP, C. J.

The defendant was charged by indictment, filed March 19, 1948, in the circuit court, second circuit, that he, “LEONCIO ALEGRE SUMNGAT at Makena, in the County of Maui, Territory of Hawaii, in the month of August 1946, the exact day or days being to the Grand Jury unknown, did unlawfully and feloniously have sexual and carnal intercourse with a female person under the age of 16 years, to-wit, Yiolet Poepoe, not the lawful wife of him the said Leoncio Alegre Sumngat,

“Contrary to the form of the statute in such cases made and provided.” The defendant pleaded…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Territory v. Young and NozawaHawaii Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Territory of Hawaii v. LowHawaii Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Territory v. KimbrelHawaii Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Territory v. IzumiHawaii Supreme Court · 1937

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. Francis Noboru YoshidaHawaii Supreme Court · 1960
  2. State v. HaleHawaii Supreme Court · 1961
  3. State v. KitashiroHawaii Supreme Court · 1964
  4. State v. KitashiroHawaii Supreme Court · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API