Legal Opinion
Bayou Bottling, Inc. v. Dr Pepper Company
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided February 21, 1984No. 82-3516PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
POLITZ, Circuit Judge:
Bayou Bottling, Inc. brought this antitrust action under sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1, 2, and section 7 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. § 18, against Dr Pepper Company and Coca-Cola Bottling Company of Lake Charles, Louisiana (LCC). Bayou sought treble damages and an order of divestiture under sections 4 and 16 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 15, 26. Following the completion of lengthy discovery, the district court granted defendants’ motions for summary judgment. 543 F. Supp. 1255. Concluding, as did the district court, that the alleged antitrust…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Blue Shield of Va. v. McCreadySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- J. Truett Payne Co. v. Chrysler Motors Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Norris v. Hearst TrustCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
- The Domed Stadium Hotel, Inc., D/B/A Holiday Inn-Superdome v. Holiday Inns, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
- Jebaco, Inc. v. Harrah's Operating Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
- Consolidated Metal Products, Inc. v. American Petroleum InstituteCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
- Coca-Cola Co. v. Harmar Bottling Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2006
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.