Legal Opinion
United States v. Dubilier Condenser Corp
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided April 10, 1933No. Nos. 316—318Published
1Opinion of the Court 1
77 L.Ed. 1114
53 S.Ct. 554
289 U.S. 178
UNITED STATES
v.
DUBILIER CONDENSER CORPORATION.
Nos. 316—318.
Argued Jan. 13—16, 1933.
Decided April 10, 1933.
The Attorney General and Mr.Thomas D. Thacher, Sol. Gen., of Washington, D.C., for the United States.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 179-181 intentionally omitted]
Mr. James H. Hughes, Jr., of Wilmington, Del., for respondent.
2Opinion of the Court · RobertsJustice Roberts
1
Three suits were brought in the District Court for Delaware against the respondent as exclusive license under three separate patents issued to Francis W. Dunmore and Percival D. Lowell. The bills recite that the inventions were…
Also in this document: Dissent.
3Cases cited49 opinions
- Meinhard v. SalmonNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Continental Paper Bag Co. v. Eastern Paper Bag Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Seymour v. OsborneSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Richmond Screw Anchor Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- United States v. Dubilier Condenser CorpSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.