Harned v. Landahl
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
KARLTON, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on defendant’s motion to dismiss. The standards for such motions are well-known and need not be repeated here. See Johnson v. City of Chico, 725 F.Supp. 1097, 1098 (E.D.Cal.1989).
I
PLAINTIFF’S CAUSE OF ACTION
Plaintiff brings suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against John Landahl, a Folsom City Police Officer. Plaintiff alleges that Landahl submitted an affidavit which contained materially false representations to a state judge in support of a search warrant. In reliance on that affidavit a warrant issued authorizing the search of plaintiffs…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Johnson v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Board of Regents of Univ. of State of NY v. TomanioSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Cross v. City of S.F.District Court, N.D. California · 2019