Legal Opinion

Harned v. Landahl

District Court, E.D. California

Decided March 17, 2000No. CIV S-00-15 LKK JFMPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

KARLTON, District Judge.

This matter is before the court on defendant’s motion to dismiss. The standards for such motions are well-known and need not be repeated here. See Johnson v. City of Chico, 725 F.Supp. 1097, 1098 (E.D.Cal.1989).

I

PLAINTIFF’S CAUSE OF ACTION

Plaintiff brings suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against John Landahl, a Folsom City Police Officer. Plaintiff alleges that Landahl submitted an affidavit which contained materially false representations to a state judge in support of a search warrant. In reliance on that affidavit a warrant issued authorizing the search of plaintiffs…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Johnson v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Board of Regents of Univ. of State of NY v. TomanioSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Cross v. City of S.F.District Court, N.D. California · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API