Harden v. Harden

After further consideration of this case on rehearing, I have come to the conclusion that the judgment rendered by the district court of Pon-totoc county in 1932, in the former action between these parties, has resulted in an effective bar to the present action for division of property and alimony. That judgment and the subsequent acts of the plaintiff in accepting the fruits thereof have, as asserted by defendant, worked an estoppel against plaintiff to seek further property or support from the defendant.

■ The former action was commenced under authority of section 678, O. S. 1931, and was…