Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. MacKley

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 3, 1955No. Appeal, 248PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Me. Justice Ci-iidsey,

The question here presented is: Does the 45-day period allowed for an appeal from a sentence imposed by a court of quarter sessions begin to run anew if the court corrects an excessive sentence after term time?

Appellant-defendant was convicted on November 25, 1953 on two bills of indictment charging him with being concerned in the managing, conducting or carrying on of a lottery in violation of the Act of June 24, 1939, P. L. 872, §601, 18 PS §4601. Following argument on motions for a new trial and in arrest of judgment which were denied, the trial judge on the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Holly v. AsheSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  2. Halderman's PetitionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  3. Fenerty Disbarment CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  4. Commonwealth v. HarrisonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  5. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Monaghan v. BurkeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BowdenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. Commonwealth v. NicelySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  3. Folino v. YoungSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. Commonwealth v. ColdingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. Commonwealth v. FergusonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1963

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API