Legal Opinion

Ford v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp.

District Court, S.D. Indiana

Decided June 22, 1987No. IP 81-371-C, IP 81-308-C, IP 81-365-C and IP 81-245-CPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

STECKLER, District Judge.

Defendants Asbestos Corporation, Ltd. (“ACL”) and Bell Asbestos Mines, Ltd. (“Bell”) have filed identical motions to dismiss in each of the above-entitled causes of action. Relying on Sandra K. Morris v. Asbestos Corporation, Ltd., Bell Asbestos Mines, Ltd., et al., No. 81-C-70 (S.D.Ind. Sept. 5, 1986) (order denying defendants’ motion to dismiss), the Court concludes that the motions must be denied.

Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(2) the defendants move the Court to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. Specifically the defendants contend that: (1) they do not…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Keeton v. Hustler Magazine, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Gray v. American Radiator & Standard Sanitary Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Wisconsin Electrical Manufacturing Co., Inc. v. Pennant Products, Inc., and County of Monroe Industrial Development AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Roberts v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API