Harris v. Matthews
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1DissentJustice Hudson
Because I believe that the Court of Appeals correctly dismissed this case as interlocutory, I respectfully dissent.
Defendant does not dispute that there was no final judgment in this case and that his appeal is thus interlocutory. However, “N.C.G.S. § 1-277 and N.C.G.S. § 7A-27(d) allow an appeal to be taken from an interlocutory order which affects a substantial right although the appeal may be interlocutory.” DKH Corp. v. Rankin-Patterson Oil *280Co., 348 N.C. 583, 585, 500 S.E.2d 666, 668 (1998). Defendant contends, and the majority agrees, that adjudication of this matter would require a…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Presbyterian Church in US v. Mary Elizabeth Blue Hull Memorial Presbyterian ChurchSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Sutton v. DukeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- Dalton v. CampSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2001
- Dickens v. PuryearSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- Abyssinia Missionary Baptist Church v. NixonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1976
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.