Hammond v. Rose
Supreme Court of Colorado
Appeal from District Court of El Paso County.
1Opinion of the Court
Rising, C.
The appellees, who were defendants below, demurred to the complaint on the ground that it did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The demurrer was sustained, and, the plaintiff standing on his complaint, judgment dismissing the action and for costs was entered. It is alleged in the complaint that the plaintiff is the owner in fee-simple of certain lands lying on both sides of Cheyenne creek, which lands were granted to Marcus A. Foster by patent from the United States, December 1, 18G5, and that plaintiff claims title as a remote grantee of said Foster; that…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Coffin v. Left Hand Ditch Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1882
3Cited by10 opinions
- Wyoming v. ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Union Mill & Mining Co. v. DangbergU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nevada · 1897
- Hutchinson v. Watson Slough Ditch Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1909
- Willey v. DeckerWyoming Supreme Court · 1903
- Meng v. CoffeeNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.