Legal Opinion

United States v. Woodward

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided December 26, 1979No. Crim. 77-117PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KNOX, District Judge.

The Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has remanded this cause for our initial determination of defendant Robert Roy Woodward’s contention that the Fifth Amendment’s protection against double jeopardy as incorporated in the doctrine of collateral estoppel bars his conviction for perjury under 18 U.S.C. § 1623. U. S. v. Woodward, No. 78-1864, 595 F.2d 1215 (3d Cir. March 9, 1979 as amended March 28, 1979).

INTRODUCTION

The perjury charge arose out of testimony Woodward gave in his own behalf at an earlier trial in which he was charged with eight counts of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Sealfon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. United States v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  4. Z. A. Adams and Jean Adams v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
  5. United States v. George Raymond DippCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Morris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1984
  2. Woods v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1997
  3. State v. DanielsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API