Legal Opinion

Aycock v. Burnett

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided May 5, 1930No. 28581PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEthridge, P. J.

The appellant was plaintiff and filed a suit in the cirr euit court for damages for an injury occasioned by the collision of an automobile driven by Coburn Hinton and R J. Burnett and a Ford truck driven by the plaintiff. The suit was filed against R J. Burnett, Barnett Burnett, and Coburn Hinton. It appears that R. J. Burnett and Coburn Hinton were going south in the direction of Laurel from a point north of Stringer, Mississippi, and that the plaintiff, Max Aycock, was going north from Laurel, and had crossed the railroad at Stringer, and was proceeding north. There was a car parked on the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Oliver v. MilesMississippi Supreme Court · 1926

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Danner v. Mid-State Paving Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Daniel v. LivingstoneMississippi Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Gulf, M. O.R. Co. v. JoinerMississippi Supreme Court · 1947
  4. State Farm Auto Ins. Companies v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2004
  5. Mangum v. ReidMississippi Supreme Court · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API