Legal Opinion

H. W. Palen's Sons v. Nelson & Caulkins, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 17, 1928PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Van Kirk,.J.

The order appealed from, changing the place of trial, was made on the sole ground that this is not a transitory action, but is a local action because an action to foreclose a mechanic’s lien. (129 Misc. 478.) In this holding we think the court erred. The action is to enforce a lien for labor done and materials furnished for a public improvement, namely, a school *358building. The recovery sought is a determination of the amount of the claim and a lien upon the funds due under the contract; also a judgment against the municipality payable out of those funds and against the defendant…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Harley v. . PlantNew York Court of Appeals · 1914
  2. People v. . Buffalo Fish Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1900
  3. Nims v. MerrittNew York Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Palen's Sons v. Nelson & Caulkins, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1927

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re John Condon Contracting Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1932
  2. Shelt Co. v. Simiele Construction Co.New York Supreme Court · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API