Legal Opinion

Bumsted v. Hoadley

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1877Published

Appeal from judgment in favor of the plaintiff, recovered on a trial at the Circuit.

1Opinion of the Court

Daniels, J.:

This action was brought to recover damages for the breach of a contract for the sale of sand. It was executed in the defendant’s name by James O. Watkins, under a power of attorney. The power limited the authority of the attorney to sell sand by the established grade which it appeared had been made of the property. In the contract executed by him no such restriction was made on the amount of the sand which could be taken away under it. And it was claimed that the quantity sold by its terms exceeded that which the agent had been authorized to sell. He acted under a special…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. The President, Etc. v. . CornenNew York Court of Appeals · 1867
  2. Alvord v. BakerNew York Supreme Court · 1832

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API