Smith & Shelton v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion op the Court bt
Chiep Justice Hurt—
Affirming.
The appellants were by separate indictment, each accused of the crime of wilfully and maliciously shooting at and wounding Harvey Miracle, with the intent to kill him, but, from the shooting* and wounding, he did not die, as denounced by section 1166, Ky. Stats. The shooting at and wounding of Miracle, by each of the appellants, occurred at the same time and place, and in the course of an attempt, as contended by the Commonwealth, by Miracle, a deputy sheriff to arrest the appellants. The witnesses in each case, were the same, and the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. MeyersOregon Supreme Court · 1910
- State v. GumWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1910
- Creighton v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1886
- Creighton v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1885
- Minniard v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1888
3Cited by5 opinions
- Meek v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
- Arthurs v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1955
- Keyes v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1937
- Morris v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1967
- Demetrius Northern-Allison v. John SeymourCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2024