Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Dean v. District of Columbia

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided January 19, 1995No. 92-CV-737Published

1ConcurrenceSteadman, Associate Judge

I join Judge FeRREn’s compelling analysis of appellants’ several arguments in Parts L, II., III., and V. of his comprehensive opinion. However, in my judgment, the marriage statute must be sustained as well against the challenge under constitutional equal protection, applicable within the District of Columbia through the due process clause of the Fifth Amendment. See Bolling v. Sharpe, 347 U.S. 497, 499-500, 74 S.Ct. 693, 694-95, 98 L.Ed. 884 (1954).

My initial difficulty with a postulate of appellants’ analysis, reflected in Judge Fer-ren’s discussion of equal protection, is its treatment of…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Turner v. SafleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Washington v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Bolling v. SharpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  5. Craig v. BorenSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API