Legal Opinion

Maloney v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 3, 1938No. 26739PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGubkry, J.

“Assault and battery may be committed by striking another with an automobile intentionally, or by driving the machine so recklessly as to justify a jury in finding that there was a reckless disregard of human life and safety. Dennard v. State, 14 Ga. App. 485 (81 S. E. 378). And see Gallery v. State, 92 Ga. 463 (2) (17 S. E. 863); Collier v. State, 39 Ga. 31, 34 [99 Am. D. 449]. The same is true where, under like circumstances, the automobile is driven against another vehicle in which persons are riding, whereby the collision occasions bruises, blows, and similar physical injuries to persons…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Gallery v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1893
  2. Tift v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916
  3. Mitchell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
  4. Wright v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1929
  5. Dennard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1914

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Duncan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1938
  2. J. A. T. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
  3. Martin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1958
  4. Mundy v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1939
  5. J. A. T. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API