Legal Opinion

Starks v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided August 11, 1939No. A-9577PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDoyle, P. J.

Plaintiff in error, Richard Starks, was informed against for the murder of Otis L. Hutton, and upon his trial was convietéd of manslaughter in the first degree. The jury was unable to agree upon the punishment. Motion for new trial was overruled April 22, 1938. The judgment and sentence of the court was that the defendant serve a term of 20 years’ imprisonment in the state penitentiary.

From the judgment and sentence he has appealed to this court.

The first and second assignments of error are the usual ones, that the verdict is contrary to the law and to the evidence.

The only other assignments…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Castleberry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1914
  2. Cannon v. TerritoryCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1909
  3. Stogsdill v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1923

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Roulston v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1957
  2. Lowrey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1948
  3. State v. RadabaughIdaho Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Doser v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1949
  5. Dilworth v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1980

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API