Legal Opinion

Hytell v. Hytell

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 7, 1964PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBernard S. Meyer, J.

In her first cause of action plaintiff seeks a declaratory judgment that she is the wife of defendant and that a Mexican divorce obtained by him is of no force and effect; in the second cause of action .she asks that a separation agreement executed by her be cancelled and set aside. An affirmative defense of consent to the Mexican divorce and estoppel is alleged by defendant. Judgment will be entered on the first cause of action declaring the Mexican divorce valid and binding upon plaintiff, and dismissing the second cause of action in the exercise of discretion.

Except for testimony…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In Re the Accounting of RhinelanderNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
  2. Yates v. YatesNew York Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Lake v. LakeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
  4. Rubinfeld v. RubinfeldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942
  5. Levy v. DockendorffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Seligman v. SeligmanNew York Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Roe v. RoeNew York Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Ramm v. RammAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1970
  4. Fitzgerald v. MorgensternCivil Court of the City of New York · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API