Legal Opinion

City of Prichard v. Harold

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 10, 1938No. 1 Div. 14PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANDERSON, Chief Justice.

The plaintiff sued the defendant, City of Prichard, for a license tax claimed to have been improperly collected and recovered a judgment for $636.95. The defendant being dissatisfied took an appeal to the Court of Appeals.

It is urged by the petitioner, for the first time, that, in as much as the defendant had a plea of set off and sought a judgment over, the amount involved was over a thousand dollars and the case was not within the jurisdiction of the Court of Appeals. True, Section 7309 of the Code of 1923 fixes the jurisdiction of said court "at One Thousand Dollars…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Life Casualty Ins. Co. of Tennessee v. WomackSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  2. Alabama Power Co. v. City of Carbon HillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  3. Walden v. City of MontgomerySupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  4. Waldrop v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
  5. City of Birmingham v. WilsonAlabama Court of Appeals · 1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. City of Andalusia v. FletcherSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
  2. Demopolis Finance Co. v. City of DemopolisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1956
  3. Franks v. City of JasperSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
  4. Franks v. City of JasperSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
  5. Horsley v. HorsleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1973

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API