Legal Opinion

Springer v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 21, 1945No. 10753PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILBUR, Circuit Judge.

The appellant was convicted of a violation of the provisions of the Selective Training and Service Act of 1940, 50 U.S. C.A.Appendix §§ 301 et seq., in that he knowingly and wilfully 'failed to report for induction when ordered so to do. This is an appeal from the judgment and sentence.

Neither the assignments of error with reference to the exclusion and introduction of evidence, nor the assignments of error with relation to instructions to the jury, conform to our rules and, therefore, need not be considered. Appellant also assigns as error the denial of his motion to *413dis…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Weems v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  2. Funk v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  3. Wolfle v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  4. Edgington v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  5. Stewart v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. United States v. Virginia Consuelo-GonzalezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
  2. Tamez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976
  3. United States v. John Paul MalinowskiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
  4. United States v. Vito M. PastoreCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
  5. United States v. A-Abras Inc., Osip TaskCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API