Legal Opinion
In re J. C. Ward & Co.
District Court, W.D. Tennessee
Decided May 11, 1882PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Hammond, I). J.
The register has overruled exceptions to the elaim for the attorney’s fee for professional services for resisting the decree of adjudication of one of the bankrupts, and by consent the validity of his action in allowing the claim is submitted to the court informally as if (properly presented under rule 34 and the practice of the court.
An involuntary petition was filed by creditors against J. C Ward and J. F. Holst, as partners, and they were adjudicated bankrupts without contest. Subsequently, it being claimed that Mrs. Margaret Holst was a partner in the firm, a supplemental…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In re BigelowDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1869
- In re HennocksburghDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1872
- In re OrneDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1867
- In re BruceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1873
- In re CrawfordDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1870
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re AdamsDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1904
- In re WardDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1879