Legal Opinion

Browder v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 20, 1892No. 3222PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from the County Court of Dallas. Tried below before Hon. E. G. Bower, County Judge. Appellant was indicted for malicious mischief in willfully and wantonly wounding a cow; and at his trial was found guilty, and his punishment was assessed at a fine of $10. It is unnecessary to state the facts as shown in the record.

1Opinion of the Court

WHITE, Presiding Judge.

Appellant’s bills of exception show that the court refused to permit the defendant to introduce more than four witnesses in his behalf, and that after said witnesses had been introduced by him he asked to be permitted to introduce several other witnesses, and upon the court refusing to do so, he asked the court to permit him to state the facts he expected to prove and could prove by said witnesses, so that what was expected to be proved by said witnesses might be incorporated in his bill of exceptions. The court refused to allow him to state the facts expected to be…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Mergentheim v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1886

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Thomas v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1984
  2. Hamman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1958
  3. State v. QuinnSupreme Court of Missouri · 1939
  4. Florida East Coast Railway Company v. MorganDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968
  5. Cope v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1923

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API