Legal Opinion

Salter v. SAIF Corp.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 11, 1991No. 88-18219 and 88-18220; CA A67685PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.

Claimant was allegedly injured while working for the putative employer, Morris Salter (Salter). The Compliance Section of the Workers’ Compensation Division issued a proposed order finding that Salter was a noncomplying employer and requesting that SAIF process the claim pursuant to ORS 656.054. Salter requested a hearing as to the order of noncompliance. SAIF denied the claim. Salter issued his own denial, and claimant’s attorney requested a hearing on Salter’s denial. After that, SAIF rescinded its denial. It did not notify Salter of his right to request a hearing on the question of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Clark v. LinnCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Astleford v. Saif Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API