Legal Opinion

Atalla v. United States Citizenship & Immigration Services

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 2, 2013No. 11-16987UnpublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Defendants United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) and its Director appeal the judgment of the district court following a trial in favor of Jamal Atalla, M.D., in his action brought under 8 U.S.C. § 1421(c), seeking a hearing de novo on the USCIS’ denial for lack of good moral character of his naturalization application. The district court found that Atalla had not given false testimony or given false testimony with the subjective intent to obtain an immigration benefit, as USCIS claimed, and found, instead, that Atalla had proved the requisite good moral…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Yuen Jung v. BarberCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
  3. United States v. HovsepianCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Amir Ahmad Bakhtiary Davijani v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), et al.District Court, N.D. California · 2026
  2. Amir Ahmad Bakhtiary Davijani v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), et al.District Court, N.D. California · 2026
  3. Atalla v. United States Citizenship & Immigration ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API