Burnham v. Karl & Gelb, P.C.
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
*386 Opinion
FOTI, J.
The plaintiff appeals from the judgment of the trial court rendered following the granting of the defendants’ motion for summary judgment. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the trial court improperly granted summary judgment in favor of the defendants as to her claims (1) of breach of contract, (2) of negligent misrepresentation and (3) of wrongful discharge. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The following facts are undisputed. The named defendant, Karl and Gelb, P.C., is a dental practice located in West Hartford that employs two periodontists, the defendants…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Pierce v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
- Sheets v. Teddy's Frosted Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Faulkner v. United Technologies Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Parsons v. United Technologies Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- D'Ulisse-Cupo v. Board of Directors of Notre Dame High SchoolSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Burnham v. Karl & Gelb, P.C.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Citino v. Redevelopment AgencyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- Rafalko v. University of New HavenConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- White v. MartinDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1998
- Krondes v. Norwalk Savings SocietyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.