Legal Opinion

Peterson v. Beatty

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided December 13, 2018No. Appeal No. 2018AP1417Published

1Opinion of the Court

KLOPPENBURG, J.1

¶1 Ray Peterson filed this small-claims action in which he (1) alleged that Stanley Beatty, doing business as Abner Boiler and Heating Company, was responsible for the failure of a boiler approximately one year after Beatty installed the boiler, and (2) sought reimbursement of the cost to replace that boiler. After a trial to the circuit court, the court found that Peterson "[had] not met [his] burden of proof" and dismissed the case. Peterson challenges the court's finding on appeal. Beatty moves for costs and fees as allowed for a frivolous appeal under WIS. STAT. RULE…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. PettitCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1992
  2. Cogswell v. Robertshaw Controls Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Amjad T. Tufail v. Midwest Hospitality, LLCWisconsin Supreme Court · 2013
  4. In Matter of Estate of DejmalWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Townsend v. MasseyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2011

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API