Legal Opinion

Linvel Bingham v. USA

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided November 30, 2016No. 15-20494; CONSOLIDATED WITH 15-41176PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PATRICK E. HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judge:

These consolidated tax refund suits are the latest in a line of cases stemming from faulty American Agri-Corp (“AMCOR”) investments, In the 1980s, Plaintiffs James and Claudette Rodgers, Avruiri arid Joan Stein, David and Jácqué Holland, and Linvel and Vicki Bingham (“Taxpayers”), were partners in AMCOR partnerships that the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) investigated as shams. 1 Taxpayers settled with the IRS and paid the amounts assessed, but now seek refunds claiming that the IRS’s assessments were -untimely and that the IRS failed to issue notices…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Duffie v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010
  2. United States v. WoodsSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  3. Angelus Milling Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  4. Jacobs v. NATIONAL DRUG INTELLIGENCE CENTERCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
  5. Keelan v. Majesco Software, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Advanced Seismic Tech., Inc. v. M/V FortitudeDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2018
  2. Baxter v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2022
  3. Nix v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2018
  4. Rische v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2021
  5. Robert Rock v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2020

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API