Legal Opinion

Cookston v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 10, 1994No. 93-1571PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARRIS, Chief Judge.

We find that the record supports the trial judge’s conclusion that Cookston’s confession was voluntarily and knowingly given; we therefore affirm Cookston’s convictions. We also agree that the judge properly rejected youthful offender treatment for Cookston who was convicted of second degree murder, an offense authorizing a sentence for a term of years not exceeding life. Duke v. State, 541 So.2d 1170 (Fla.1989); Tomlinson v. State, 589 So.2d 362 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991), rev. denied, 599 So.2d 1281 (Fla.1992).

Cookston also urges that we should reverse his “departure” sentence…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pope v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1990
  2. Barfield v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
  3. Owens v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
  4. Duke v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1989
  5. Tomlinson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. BrendellDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  2. Knowles v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API