Legal Opinion

Planning Research Corporation v. Federal Power Commission

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided March 10, 1977No. 75-1540PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McGOWAN, Circuit Judge:

In this “reverse-Freedom of Information Act” case, appellant, a supplier of services under a contract with the Federal Power Commission, sought in the District Court to prevent the Commission from complying with a request by a third party under the Act for information about the contract. The District Court granted a pretrial motion to dismiss the complaint for want of subject-matter jurisdiction; and this appeal is from that action. For the reasons hereinafter set forth, we hold that the District Court had jurisdiction to entertain the suit.

I

In May, 1974, the Commission…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Richard Pickus v. United States Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
  3. Charles River Park "A", Inc. v. Department of Housing & Urban DevelopmentCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
  4. International Engineering Company, Division of A-T-O, Inc. v. Elliott L. Richardson, Secretary of DefenseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
  5. 13 Fair empl.prac.cas. 868, 12 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 11,208 Westinghouse Electric Corp. And Its Subsidiary, Fraser & Johnston Company v. James R. Schlesinger, Secretary, U. S. Department of Defense, Concerned Workers, Intervenor-Defendants. Westinghouse Electric Corporation and Its Subsidiary, Fraser & Johnston Co. v. James R. Schlesinger, Secretary, U. S. Department of Defense, Westinghouse Electric Corporation and Its Subsidiary, Fraser & Johnston Co. v. James R. Schlesinger, Secretary, U. S. Department of Defense, Concerned Workers, Westinghouse Electric Corp. And Its Subsidiary, Fraser & Johnston Company v. James R. Schlesinger, Secretary, U. S. Department of Defense, Concerned Workers, Intervenors-Appellants. Westinghouse Electric Corp. And Its Subsidiary, Fraser & Johnston Company v. James R. Schlesinger, Secretary, U. S. Department of Defense, Concerned Workers, Defendant-Intervenors. United States Steel Corporation v. James R. Schlesinger, Secretary, U. S. Department of Defense, United States Steel Corporation v. James R. Schlesinger, Secretary, U. S. Department of Defense, General Motors Corporation v. James R. Schlesinger, Secretary, U. S. Department of Defense, General Motors Corporation v. James R. Schlesinger, Secretary, U. S. Department of DefenseCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. United States v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1978
  2. Sears, Roebuck and Co. v. General Services AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
  3. Chrysler Corp. v. SchlesingerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
  4. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. BerklundDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1978
  5. Consumers Union of the United States, Inc. And Public Citizen's Health Research Group v. Consumer Product Safety CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API