Legal Opinion

Jones, Collector of Internal Revenue v. Taunah

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided January 2, 1951No. 4109_1PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRATTON, Circuit Judge.

This case presents for determination the question whether income derived from restricted allotted lands in Oklahoma belonging to full-blood restricted Comanche Indians is subject to federal income tax.

Bert Taunah and Peawifeah Taunah, hereinafter referred to as the taxpayers, are full-blood restricted Comanche Indians. Bert owned certain restricted land in Oklahoma, some of which was originally allotted to him and some of which he inherited. In like manner, Peawifeah owned other restricted land in that state, some of which was originally allotted to her and some of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Board of Comm'rs of Jackson Cty. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. United States v. RickertSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  3. United States Trust Co. v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  4. The Cherokee TobaccoSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  5. Choteau v. BurnetSupreme Court of the United States · 1931

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Squire v. CapoemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. Dolezilek v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1954
  3. Holt v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1965
  4. Brasier v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1955
  5. Capoeman v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1952

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API