Legal Opinion

Employes' Benefit Ass'n of American Steel Foundries v. Commissioner

United States Board of Tax Appeals

Decided January 11, 1929No. Docket No. 12421PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*1183OPINION.

Siefkin :

In brief, the petitioner makes two contentions. First, that it is exempt; and, second, that if it is not exempt, the contributions, fees, or dues of members should either be not considered as income at all or the petitioner should be entitled to a deduction equal to the amount of the receipts.

It is our opinion that the petitioner is not exempt. To be entitled to exemption it must bring itself within the exemption clauses of the taxing statute, which, in this proceeding, are found in section 231 of the Revenue Act of 1918. That section is composed of 14 paragraphs. The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Trinidad v. Sagrada Orden De Predicadores De La Provincia Del Santisimo Rosario De FilipinasSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. United States v. Boston InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. Commercial Health & Accident Co. v. PickeringDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 1922
  4. Bankers' & Planters' Mut. Ins. v. WalkerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1922

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Water Quality Association Employees' Benefit Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
  2. Jockey Club v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1934
  3. Jockey Club v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API