Boehringer v. Yuma County
Arizona Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the County of Yuma. Frank Baxter, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1DissentCunningham, J.
I dissent from the order dismissing this appeal upon the grounds that this court has no jurisdiction because the amount claimed is less than $200. I am convinced this case comes squarely within the exception recognized in section 4 of article 6, Constitution, viz.-. “ . . . Unless the action involves the validity of a tax ... or statute. ’ ’ The particular grounds upon which I disagree are that this action involves the validity of chapter 93, Laws of 1912, as applied to this appellant's rights; the majority holding that the question involved in the action is one of construction, and not one…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Capital Traction Co. v. HofSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- City of Rochester v. . WestNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
- Grannis v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Chaplin v. Commissioners of HighwaysIllinois Supreme Court · 1888
- Baltimore & Potomac Railroad v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.