Legal Opinion

Borough of Paramus v. Etaner Enterprises

New Jersey Tax Court

Decided April 21, 1992PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CRABTREE, J.T.C.

Plaintiff moves for reconsideration of this court’s opinion of February 14, 1992, denying relief under the Correction of Errors statute, N.J.SA 54:51A-7, for 1987, 1988 and 1989. For the reasons hereinafter stated the motion will be granted.

The facts as established at the trial may be briefly summarized.

Plaintiff undertook a district-wide revaluation in 1986, effective in 1987. Defendant’s properly, a Lord & Taylor anchor store in *437the Fashion Center Mall, was valued by the revaluation firm at $11,827,000. A principal of the revaluation firm, Richard M. Chaiken, discussed the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Towne v. EisnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  2. NJ Builders, Owners and Managers Association v. BlairSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1972
  3. New Capitol Bar & Grill Corp. v. Division of Employment SecuritySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
  4. Manczak v. Township of DoverNew Jersey Tax Court · 1981
  5. Sabella v. Lacey Tp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Liva Group, L.L.C. v. Borough of ParamusNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1998
  2. City of Port Republic v. BruscoNew Jersey Tax Court · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API