Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Zoological Board of Control v. City of St. Louis

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided January 18, 1928PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWalker, C. J.

This is an original action in mandamus. Its purpose is to compel the respondents to appropriate out of the taxes levied for municipal purposes in the city of St. Louis for the current year the equivalent of two cents on each hundred dollars of the assessed valuation of the taxable property of said city for the maintenance of a zoological park and to place the amount so appropriated at the disposal of the relators. The relators are members of the Zoological Board of Control of the City of St. Louis, and comprise a majority of said board. The respondents are the Mayor, the Comptroller and the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Ewing v. HoblitzelleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1884
  2. State ex rel. Hawes v. MasonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1899
  3. State ex rel. Garner v. Missouri & Kansas Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1905
  4. St. Louis v. DorrSupreme Court of Missouri · 1898
  5. State ex rel. Bixby v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1912

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Walters v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1953
  2. Coleman v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1944
  3. State v. ChadeayneSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  4. Hull v. BaumannSupreme Court of Missouri · 1939
  5. State Ex Rel. Emerson v. City of Mound CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1934

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API