Legal Opinion
Smaul v. Irvington General Hospital
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided September 29, 1987PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Per curiam
This appeal, pursuant to certification granted, 107 N.J. 49 (1986), challenges the Appellate Division’s affirmance of the trial court’s judgment that plaintiff is entitled to personal injury protection (PIP) benefits under his automobile insurance policy with defendant Allstate Insurance Company (Allstate). Plaintiff sustained injuries and damages when he was assaulted after stopping to ask directions of two pedestrians, who, in addition to beating plaintiff, took his money and attempted to steal his car. We affirm.
I
On April 21, 1983, plaintiff, Felix Smaul, was operating his automobile on…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Westchester Fire Ins. Co. v. Continental Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1973
- Westchester Fire Insurance v. Continental InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1974
- Uzcatequi-Gaymon v. NJ Mfrs. Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1984
- Smaul v. Irvington General Hosp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1986
3Cited by18 opinions
- Lindstrom v. Hanover InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
- Vasil v. ZulloNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1990
- Cerullo v. Allstate Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1989
- Diehl v. Cumberland Mutual Fire InsuranceNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997
- Svenson v. NATIONAL CONSUMER INS.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1999
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.