Legal Opinion

L S B Z, Inc. v. Brokis

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 17, 1992No. 2-92-0310PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRESIDING JUSTICE INGLIS

delivered the opinion of the court:

Defendant, Susan Brokis (the stylist), appeals from the trial court’s grant of a preliminary injunction (see 134 Ill. 2d R. 307(a)(1)) in favor of her former employer, L S B Z, Inc., doing business as Za Zu Designs, a hairstyling salon, and Sam Segretto, co-owner with Raymond “Butch” Koubek of Za Zu (the salon). The preliminary injunction restrains the stylist from violating a covenant against post-employment competition with the salon. The stylist argues that the trial court’s order must be reversed because (1) the salon failed to…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Buzz Barton & Associates, Inc. v. GiannoneIllinois Supreme Court · 1985
  2. McRand, Inc. v. Van BeelenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985
  3. Millard Maintenance Service Co. v. BerneroAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990
  4. Booth v. GreberAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
  5. Hydroaire, Inc. v. SagerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Abbott-Interfast Corp. v. HarkabusAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
  2. Stenstrom Petroleum Services Group Inc. v. MeschAppellate Court of Illinois · 2007
  3. Lyle R. Jager Agency, Inc. v. StewardAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
  4. Audio Properties, Inc. v. KovachAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995
  5. The Agency, Inc. v. GroveAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API