Southern Wire & Iron Co. v. Thomas

(after stating the facts as above). In the court’s decision that the appellant’s suit was barred by the two years’ statute, of limitation, there is involved the further conclusion by him that the agree ment between the parties under which the building material in suit was sold and bought was an' oral, and not a written, agreement. If the court was warranted in finding, or in attaching the legal effect to the evidence that the agreement was oral and not in writing, then the judgment must be affirmed, for it affirmatively appears that the appellant’s suit was filed more than two, but less than…