Legal Opinion

Carrere v. Castano

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided February 18, 1981No. 12335PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHOTT, Judge.

Plaintiff, a qualified elector of District D, of the City of New Orleans, brought this action pursuant to LSA-R.S. 18:1401 et seq., objecting to the candidacy of defendant Peter Castaño for the office of Councilman, District D, of the City of New Orleans. Plaintiff has appealed from a dismissal of his suit. The issue is whether defendant meets the residency requirements of the City Charter to qualify as a candidate in the election.

Section 3-104 of the City Charter provides:

“Candidates for district councilman shall have been residents of the district from which elected for at…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hall v. GodchauxSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1921
  2. Charbonnet v. HayesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1975
  3. Stavis v. EnglerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1967
  4. Brown v. Democratic Committee, Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Third DistrictLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1970
  5. Mix v. BlanchardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1975

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Tomlinson v. FrazierLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1982
  2. Carrere v. CastanoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1981
  3. Opinion Number, Louisiana Attorney General Reports2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API