Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Long

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 20, 1978No. 1572PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CERCONE, Judge:

This is a direct appeal from appellant’s conviction following a jury trial, on charges of rape and simple assault. Appellant asserts that the prosecutor made improper and prejudicial remarks during his summation. Furthermore, appellant argues that his trial counsel was ineffective because he failed to object to the prosecutor’s remarks. After a careful review of the record, we reverse and remand for a new trial.

The general rule in this area of the law is that a prosecutor must limit his argument to the facts in evidence and the legitimate inferences therefrom. Commonwealth v.…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Washington v. MaroneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  2. Commonwealth v. ClairSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Commonwealth v. StoltzfusSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. Commonwealth v. SimonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  5. Commonwealth v. PerkinsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. JudySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  2. Commonwealth v. BensonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. People v. WiseMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Commonwealth v. YoungkinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. Commonwealth v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API