Legal Opinion

Hogan Ex Rel. Murphy v. Turland

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided July 31, 1968No. 11531PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

O’QUINN, Justice.

In our first consideration of this appeal we concluded that this Court did not have jurisdiction because the mandamus proceeding pertained to a criminal matter and the jurisdiction of courts of civil appeals is limited to civil actions. The appeal was ordered dismissed. 419 S.W.2d 383.

The Supreme Court in considering the case resolved a conflict heretofore existing among courts of civil appeals on this question and held that a mandamus proceeding is a civil rather than criminal action. 428 S.W.2d 316 (Tex.1968).

In compliance with the ruling of the Supreme Court, we have…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hogan Ex Rel. Murphy v. TurlandTexas Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Village of Avon v. PopaOhio Court of Appeals · 1953
  3. Winkler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1952
  4. Ex Parte RubisonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1960
  5. Berume v. HughesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ex Parte GilesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
  2. Fouke v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
  3. Ex Parte GilesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API