Legal Opinion

Holmes v. . Upton

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 15, 1926PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Cueiam.

The plaintiff brought suit to recover damages for personal injury. She alleged that a bridge had been constructed over a ditch or canal in Camden County; that it was the duty of the owners of the land benefited by the drain and of the Highway Commission of Camden County to keep the bridge in repair; that they negligently failed to perform their duty in this respect, in consequence of which the bridge had become defective; and that by reason of such defect, while attempting to cross the bridge, she was thrown from a wagon and injured. The owners of the land and the highway…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Carpenter v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  2. Hipp v. . FarrellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  3. Howland v. City of AshevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
  4. Fore v. . FeimsterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  5. Lowman v. . ComrsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hipp v. . FerrallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API