Legal Opinion

Deutsch v. Adams

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 20, 1950PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtCuff, J.

Two motions are to be considered. As these motion papers are presented, they are entitled in two actions. The first is: Deutsch, as assignee of Eebrug Corp., plaintiff, against Adams, defendant. The second is Adams, defendant and third-party plaintiff, a.gainst Eebrug Corp., third-party defendant. This has resulted because a third-party has been impleaded under section 193-a of the Civil Practice Act. The complaint has not been amended to state a cause of action against the impleaded party. Although somewhat confusing, the titles employed seem to be the way the Bar has entitled this kind of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Fowler v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1948

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. L. & J. Concrete Corp. v. Di GiorgioNew York Supreme Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API