Legal Opinion

City of Chicago v. Fort

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided October 6, 1970No. 41945PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Schaefer

The defendants, Johnny Lee Fort, Edward Bey, Andrew McChristian, Jeff Fort, and Beuna Bey, were charged with disorderly conduct in violation of section 193 — 1 (d) of the Municipal Code of the City of Chicago. They waived a trial by jury and on their trial before the court they offered no evidence, and moved for a “directed verdict” of acquittal at the close of the City’s case. The trial judge denied the motion and fined each defendant $50 plus costs of $5. Constitutional questions are involved, and the defendants have appealed directly to this court.

Section 193 — 1 provides in pertinent…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Cox v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Brown v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Shuttlesworth v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Feiner v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  5. The PEOPLE v. RabyIllinois Supreme Court · 1968

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Andy Thayer v. Ralph ChiczewskiCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
  4. Goldhamer v. NagodeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
  5. Davis v. SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API