Legal Opinion

Hubert v. Hubert

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 24, 1907PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of Harris County. Tried below before Hon. W. P. Hamblen.

1Opinion of the Court

PLEASANTS, Associate Justice.

Prior to April 7, 1906, the appellant and appellee were husband and wife. On that date, by a decree of the District Court of Harris County, the bonds of matrimony theretofore existing between said parties were dissolved and it was adjudged that the property in controversy in this suit, which consists of a lot of blacksmith’s tools, that were in appellant’s possession and were being used by him in conducting a blacksmith’s shop in the city of Houston, was community property of appellant and appellee. It was further adjudged that said community was indebted in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ayres v. DupreyTexas Supreme Court · 1864
  2. Holmes v. BucknerTexas Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Morris v. HastingsTexas Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Zachry v. Robertson Dba.Texas Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Mumme v. SpiesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  3. Service Drilling Co. v. WoodsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
  4. Hughes v. HughesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1948
  5. Leatherwood v. StephensCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API