Julius Chris Fisherman v. Walter D. Achuff, Etc.

The order of the district court is reversed.

We do not believe appellant’s contention about a nunc pro tunc order of the state trial judge rises to federal constitutional dimensions. Further, we are satisfied with California’s handling of it. People v. Fisherman, 237 Cal.App.2d 356, 47 Cal.Rptr. 33, 35.

Somewhere, we believe that Fisherman is entitled to a hearing on his allegations about his guilty plea and his allegations about denial of effective representation of counsel at his probation revocation-resentencing hearing.

We suggest that the district court might well order that it will delay…