Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. DeLuzio

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 27, 1994Published

1DissentO’Hern, J.

The Court has set aside the convictions of Lois Sanders, Donald Sanders, and Theodore Watley for promoting gambling, a violation of N.J.S.A 2C:37-2, and possession of gambling records, a violation of N.J.SA 2C:37-3, on the basis of the Appellate Division opinion below, 274 N.J.Super. 101, 643 A.2d 609 (1993). Specifically, the State charged defendants with promoting an illegal lottery, a third-degree offense under N.J.SA 2C:37-2. The Appellate Division held that the familiar form of a pyramid scheme is not a “lottery” within the meaning of N.J.SA 2C:37-l(h), and therefore does not constitute…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Cunningham v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. Anthony J. Bosco v. Robert B. SerhantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
  3. Phalen v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1850
  4. Lucky Calendar Co. v. CohenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1955
  5. State v. SandersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API