Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of Ehinger

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided October 21, 2005No. 93,680PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Larson, J.:

In this appeal, Sandra Ehinger contends the trial court erroneously modified her former husband, Tim Ehinger s, maintenance obligation pursuant to K.S.A. 2004 Supp. 60-1610(b)(2).

Sandra makes a jurisdiction argument and alternatively suggests that because Tim has not shown a change of circumstances, the award may not be altered.

The facts are not in dispute and will be briefly stated.

Tim and Sandra were married in 1979. Tim filed for divorce in 2003, and the decree of divorce dated July 22, 2003, specifically provided:

“15. Respondent, Sandra Ehinger, is entitled to maintenance from…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Kansas Public Employees Retirement System v. Reimer & Koger Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1997
  2. Director of Taxation v. Kansas Krude Oil Reclaiming Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1984
  3. State Ex Rel. Stephan v. Kansas Racing CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1990
  4. Cooper v. WerholtzSupreme Court of Kansas · 2004
  5. GT, Kansas, L.L.C. v. Riley County Register of DeedsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2001

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re the Marriage of EvansCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2007
  2. In re Marriage of CalvertCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API